These are great tips Daniel, thanks. I've saved this and will be putting it to use.
Can AI content be improved? ..... Yes.
Does AI content suck?.... No.
The endlessly repeated memorized mantra of "AI content sucks" is a function of the Substack community, a very specific group of people trying to make a living as writers. That is, the LEAST…
These are great tips Daniel, thanks. I've saved this and will be putting it to use.
Can AI content be improved? ..... Yes.
Does AI content suck?.... No.
The endlessly repeated memorized mantra of "AI content sucks" is a function of the Substack community, a very specific group of people trying to make a living as writers. That is, the LEAST OBJECTIVE group of people on the Internet, when it comes to the subject of AI.
There are a million different contexts in which words are used to communicate online. AI in it's current form is suitable for some contexts, and not suitable for other contexts. Thus, talking about AI content as if it were a single thing is silly.
Your article above illustrates this beautifully. If a person uses ChatGPT in an ignorant manner (as I have often done) then the results will be modest. If the same person take the time to learn about this new technology, the results can improve considerably, and thus be suitable for a wider range of contexts.
The range of contexts in which AI is suitable is very likely to continually expand over time. Thus, endlessly chanting "AI sucks" is a kind of a stupid way for Substackers to prepare themselves for what seems to be an inevitable future.
Your article is great Daniel, a very useful addition. But it would have been a bit better if you weren't also feeding the Substack Myth Machine.
These are great tips Daniel, thanks. I've saved this and will be putting it to use.
Can AI content be improved? ..... Yes.
Does AI content suck?.... No.
The endlessly repeated memorized mantra of "AI content sucks" is a function of the Substack community, a very specific group of people trying to make a living as writers. That is, the LEAST OBJECTIVE group of people on the Internet, when it comes to the subject of AI.
There are a million different contexts in which words are used to communicate online. AI in it's current form is suitable for some contexts, and not suitable for other contexts. Thus, talking about AI content as if it were a single thing is silly.
Your article above illustrates this beautifully. If a person uses ChatGPT in an ignorant manner (as I have often done) then the results will be modest. If the same person take the time to learn about this new technology, the results can improve considerably, and thus be suitable for a wider range of contexts.
The range of contexts in which AI is suitable is very likely to continually expand over time. Thus, endlessly chanting "AI sucks" is a kind of a stupid way for Substackers to prepare themselves for what seems to be an inevitable future.
Your article is great Daniel, a very useful addition. But it would have been a bit better if you weren't also feeding the Substack Myth Machine.
I'm happy you find the tips useful!